Great video. I really admire Mary Phagan Keene for her thoroughness and persistence. She seems like a very nice person of high integrity.
I first heard about Leo Frank growing up Jewish in Chicago in the 1950's. Naturally, I devoured Harry Golden's books, "Only in America" and "For 2 Cents Plain". He did describe the Leo Frank incident as a framing and lynching in "For 2 Cents Plain". Golden didn't include that detail that he undoubtedly covered in his book "A Little Girl is Dead". I assumed the popular account was true because I never heard a different version, at least not until I heard a video by Ryan on it.
As I recall, Golden himself gave material to refute the claim that Frank was convicted because of prejudice against Jews. Golden migrated to North Carolina from New York after he served a prison term for mail and stock fraud (probably well-deserved). Golden portrayed Southerners a somewhat backwards, but they invariably turned themselves inside out to accommodate Golden as a Jew. In other words, no prejudice.
I looked up the case on the internet and found a very valuable summary of evidence that Frank was guilty, an article by Brandford Huie. Huie was a deep investigative journalist who wrote, among other best sellers "Three Lives for Mississippi". Anyway, this video is a very good summary of the evidence in the Leo Frank trial. It debunks a lot of claims, including the claim that x-rays of the bite marks showed that Frank could not have done the killing.
Figures. The Talmudists doing Talmudists things. 🤢
Great video. I really admire Mary Phagan Keene for her thoroughness and persistence. She seems like a very nice person of high integrity.
I first heard about Leo Frank growing up Jewish in Chicago in the 1950's. Naturally, I devoured Harry Golden's books, "Only in America" and "For 2 Cents Plain". He did describe the Leo Frank incident as a framing and lynching in "For 2 Cents Plain". Golden didn't include that detail that he undoubtedly covered in his book "A Little Girl is Dead". I assumed the popular account was true because I never heard a different version, at least not until I heard a video by Ryan on it.
As I recall, Golden himself gave material to refute the claim that Frank was convicted because of prejudice against Jews. Golden migrated to North Carolina from New York after he served a prison term for mail and stock fraud (probably well-deserved). Golden portrayed Southerners a somewhat backwards, but they invariably turned themselves inside out to accommodate Golden as a Jew. In other words, no prejudice.
I looked up the case on the internet and found a very valuable summary of evidence that Frank was guilty, an article by Brandford Huie. Huie was a deep investigative journalist who wrote, among other best sellers "Three Lives for Mississippi". Anyway, this video is a very good summary of the evidence in the Leo Frank trial. It debunks a lot of claims, including the claim that x-rays of the bite marks showed that Frank could not have done the killing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxnkJtUfEPk&t=2s