I started watching Tucker Carlson’s interview with Dave Smith and Tucker says “their accusations are confessions” in some context I can’t recall but I was thinking, Tucker is listening to Dawson interviews. He also discussed Scott Ritter and it also sounded like he had watched one of your interviews. I could be wrong. But… could Tucker be about to ask Ry Dawson to have a conversation??? Hmm…
Most or all of the instances described took place almost a quarter of a century ago. The report seems a bit dated to me.
Taking the documentary at face value, it seems much or all of the problem stems from US officials refusing to advocate for the interests of the US. The technology transfers from Israel to China seem to have been well-known to US officials. It would have been simple enough to say "either stop the technology sales or US aid will be discontinued".
AIPAC is a big problem. How is it AIPAC officials don't have to register as agents of a foreign interest? Robert Barnes asserts that Arab nations spend more money in the US and hence have more influence, than does Israel. The most profligate spender in Washington is likely Saudi Arabia, which cannot be considered an enemy of Israel.
Again, the biggest problem with the documentary, as I see it, is the very dated character of its information.
I started watching Tucker Carlson’s interview with Dave Smith and Tucker says “their accusations are confessions” in some context I can’t recall but I was thinking, Tucker is listening to Dawson interviews. He also discussed Scott Ritter and it also sounded like he had watched one of your interviews. I could be wrong. But… could Tucker be about to ask Ry Dawson to have a conversation??? Hmm…
Dawson’s crime was being right about these goblins and goblin activities long before the masses caught on.
Most or all of the instances described took place almost a quarter of a century ago. The report seems a bit dated to me.
Taking the documentary at face value, it seems much or all of the problem stems from US officials refusing to advocate for the interests of the US. The technology transfers from Israel to China seem to have been well-known to US officials. It would have been simple enough to say "either stop the technology sales or US aid will be discontinued".
AIPAC is a big problem. How is it AIPAC officials don't have to register as agents of a foreign interest? Robert Barnes asserts that Arab nations spend more money in the US and hence have more influence, than does Israel. The most profligate spender in Washington is likely Saudi Arabia, which cannot be considered an enemy of Israel.
Again, the biggest problem with the documentary, as I see it, is the very dated character of its information.
The Jesuit Order = Zionist Israel's chosen people
thank you